Skip to content

Menu

Stoel Rives LLP logo
Current Page:TopicsSubscribeHomeOur TeamOur ServicesContact
Search
Close
StatesSub-MenuCaliforniaMinnesotaCauses / IssuesSub-MenuAir QualityCOVID-19Environmental ContaminationHigh Speed RailNPDESWater QualityIndustriesSub-MenuAgribusinessEnergyMiningOil and GasTimberWineLaws / RegulationsSub-MenuAB 32 California Global Warming Solutions ActCEQA: The California Environmental Quality ActClean Water ActEndangered Species ActProposition 65Regulations
Subscribe
Current Page: All Topics

Stoel Rives Environmental Law

Insight and Information for the Environmental & Natural Resource Industry

Topics

AB 32 California Global Warming Solutions Act

Senate Bill Proposes Major Market-Based Remodel of Cap-and-Trade ProgramWhat You Need to Know about the Proposed Revisions to Cap and TradeU.S. Supreme Court Declines to Hear Dispute over California Low Carbon Fuel Standard

Agribusiness

White Paper Finds No Evidence of Elevated Threat to Human or Crop Safety from Use of Oil Field Produced Water to Irrigate CropsState Water Board to Hold Additional Winery General Order Fees Stakeholder Meeting on April 28, 2021State Water Board to Hold Upcoming Winery General Order Fees Stakeholder Meeting and Public Training Workshop Webinars in March and April 2021

Air Quality

EPA Reconsiders New Risk Management Program Regulations, but Regulations Remain in EffectOhio v. EPA: SCOTUS Issues Stay in EPA’s Multi-State Air FIPSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL UPDATE – NEW AIR QUALITY AND OIL & GAS REGULATORY DEVELOPMENTS

California

No Pause for Climate Disclosures: Court Denies Motion for Preliminary Injunction Against California’s SB 253 and SB 261California’s New Climate-Related Disclosure LawsState Water Board to Consider Adoption of proposed Statewide Construction Stormwater General Permit at September 8, 2022 Meeting

Causes / Issues

SCOTUS Strikes Down “End-Result” Limitations in NPDES PermitsEPA Reconsiders New Risk Management Program Regulations, but Regulations Remain in EffectOhio v. EPA: SCOTUS Issues Stay in EPA’s Multi-State Air FIP

CEQA: The California Environmental Quality Act

Updates to CEQA Guidelines for Transportation Impacts Analysis Under SB 743Environmental Challenge Blasts Kern County Oil and Gas RulesEnvironmental Justice Lawsuit Accuses L.A. of Discriminatory Oil Permitting

Clean Water Act

When EPA Comes Knocking: Guidance on Environmental EnforcementNinth Circuit Signals Potential Changes to EPA Effluent GuidelinesSCOTUS Strikes Down “End-Result” Limitations in NPDES Permits

Climate Change

SEC Stays Its Climate Disclosure RulesThe New SEC Climate Disclosure Rule Will Drive Risk Mitigation and Value Creation

Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

EPA Designates PFOA and PFOS as Hazardous Substances Under CERCLA

COVID-19

State Water Agencies Expect Water Use Reporting to Continue as Normal as California Shelters in Place

Endangered Species Act

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service Propose to Rescind the Regulatory Definition of “Harm” Under Endangered Species ActU.S Fish and Wildlife Service Proposes to List the Monarch Butterfly as Threatened, Seeks Comments on Developing a Final RuleEndangered Species Act Final Regulatory Revisions Released

Energy

New Department of Interior Review May Heighten Scrutiny and Lengthen Permitting Timelines for Some Wind and Solar ProjectsU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service Propose to Rescind the Regulatory Definition of “Harm” Under Endangered Species ActEffective Immediately, California Energy Commission Jurisdiction Expands to Include Non-Thermal Projects Greater Than 50 MW

Environmental Contamination

SCOTUS Strikes Down “End-Result” Limitations in NPDES PermitsEPA Designates PFOA and PFOS as Hazardous Substances Under CERCLAForce Majeure Probably Doesn’t Permit Smoke Taint Rejection

High Speed Rail

Construction For The California High-Speed Rail Is Chugging Right AlongHigh-Speed Rail Authority Issues Progress ReportHigh-Speed Rail Authority Under Fire for Disrupting San Joaquin Kit Fox Habitat

Industries

New Department of Interior Review May Heighten Scrutiny and Lengthen Permitting Timelines for Some Wind and Solar ProjectsU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service Propose to Rescind the Regulatory Definition of “Harm” Under Endangered Species ActNew EPA Rule on PFAS: Urgent Action Required for Manufacturers & Importers

Laws / Regulations

When EPA Comes Knocking: Guidance on Environmental EnforcementNo Pause for Climate Disclosures: Court Denies Motion for Preliminary Injunction Against California’s SB 253 and SB 261Ninth Circuit Signals Potential Changes to EPA Effluent Guidelines

Manufacturing

New EPA Rule on PFAS: Urgent Action Required for Manufacturers & Importers

Mining

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service Propose to Rescind the Regulatory Definition of “Harm” Under Endangered Species Act

Minnesota

Minnesota Enacts Sweeping PFAS Restrictions

NEPA

When EPA Comes Knocking: Guidance on Environmental EnforcementSeven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County: Agencies Granted Substantial Deference in Assessing Project Scope and Environmental ImpactsFederal Government Finalizes Significant Changes to NEPA Regulations

NPDES

SCOTUS Strikes Down “End-Result” Limitations in NPDES PermitsState Water Board to Consider Adoption of proposed Statewide Construction Stormwater General Permit at September 8, 2022 MeetingState Water Board Receiving Limited Comments on Its Proposed Reissuance of the Statewide NPDES Construction Stormwater General Permit; Will Consider Adoption At July 19, 2022 Meeting

Oil and Gas

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service Propose to Rescind the Regulatory Definition of “Harm” Under Endangered Species ActWhite Paper Finds No Evidence of Elevated Threat to Human or Crop Safety from Use of Oil Field Produced Water to Irrigate CropsSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL UPDATE – NEW AIR QUALITY AND OIL & GAS REGULATORY DEVELOPMENTS

Proposition 65

9th Circuit Ruling Halts Prop 65 Acrylamide Lawsuits, AgainCalifornia Landlords May Need to Take Additional Steps by July 2019 to Comply with Prop 65A Prop. 65 Win for Winemakers: No Separate Warning Required for Inorganic Arsenic

Regulations

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service Propose to Rescind the Regulatory Definition of “Harm” Under Endangered Species ActSCOTUS Strikes Down “End-Result” Limitations in NPDES PermitsThe Chevron Doctrine's Gone, but the APA Lives On

States

No Pause for Climate Disclosures: Court Denies Motion for Preliminary Injunction Against California’s SB 253 and SB 261California’s New Climate-Related Disclosure LawsMinnesota Enacts Sweeping PFAS Restrictions

Timber

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service Propose to Rescind the Regulatory Definition of “Harm” Under Endangered Species ActCalifornia Water Commission Adopts Regulations For Changing Groundwater Basin BoundariesSupreme Court Rejects Logging Road Permit Requirement

Trump

New Department of Interior Review May Heighten Scrutiny and Lengthen Permitting Timelines for Some Wind and Solar ProjectsNinth Circuit Signals Potential Changes to EPA Effluent Guidelines

Uncategorized

Be Careful of What You Wish For – Environmental Groups Complain about the Environmental Study of Hydraulic Fracturing That They Sued BLM to doOSPR Extends Rulemaking Comment Period for Inland FacilitiesStatus of Oil and Gas-related Bills Proposed in California's 2015-2016 Legislative Session

Water Quality

SCOTUS Strikes Down “End-Result” Limitations in NPDES PermitsState Water Board to Consider Adoption of proposed Statewide Construction Stormwater General Permit at September 8, 2022 MeetingState Water Board Receiving Limited Comments on Its Proposed Reissuance of the Statewide NPDES Construction Stormwater General Permit; Will Consider Adoption At July 19, 2022 Meeting

Water Rights

U.S. Supreme Court Limits Federal Government’s Obligation to Secure Water for the Navajo Nation

Wine

State Water Board to Hold Additional Winery General Order Fees Stakeholder Meeting on April 28, 2021State Water Board to Hold Upcoming Winery General Order Fees Stakeholder Meeting and Public Training Workshop Webinars in March and April 2021Update: State Water Board Adopts Final Winery General Order

About Stoel Rives Environmental Law

Learn More

Few firms view their Environment, Land Use, and Natural Resources practices as core legal services. Stoel Rives is one of them. The firm ranks #8 in the United States according to Law360’s list of the largest practices of its kind. Our sophisticated compliance counseling, permitting, regulatory development, and litigation practices continue a long tradition of specialization and deep experience. Our environment, land use, and natural resource attorneys incorporate prior agency experience, technical acumen, and industry knowledge into their legal advice. They also build strong relationships with agency officials and industry associations. Our litigation successes include landmark decisions. More than 60 attorneys, paralegals, and compliance analysts comprise Stoel Rives’ nationwide Environment, Land Use & Natural Resources practice.

Stoel Rives LLP logo
Anchorage•Boise•Minneapolis•Portland• Sacramento•Salt Lake City•San Diego•San Francisco•Seattle•Washington
RSS Facebook LinkedIn Twitter
Disclaimer & Privacy Policy
  • Home
  • Our Team
  • Our Services
  • Topics
  • Subscribe
  • Contact

About Our Firm

Stoel Rives is a leading U.S. corporate and litigation law firm providing high-quality services to sophisticated business clients at every stage of their evolution. With more than 325 attorneys in seven states and Washington, D.C., Stoel Rives is a nationally recognized leader in the energy and natural resources industries. From deals and disputes to compliance and counseling, clients turn to Stoel Rives for their most complex business challenges. Let’s navigate the future together. Learn more at stoel.com.

Copyright © 2025, Stoel Rives LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo